Exploring Dr Stiffler's Spatial Energy Coherence and Spatial Resonance effects.

[Gravock]

The Centripetal Force of the earth moving around the sun is equal to the mass of the earth multiplied by earth's centripetal Acceleration. The centripetal acceleration of the earth is Velocity^2 divided by orbit Radius = .00630446374625. Therefore earth's centripetal Force is = 3.7651509559105 x 10^22. Thus, when you take the Pressure of the electrical-mass coming off the sun which is the pressure within the earth's energy sphere (.40276241457847) and multiply it by 1/3 of the surface area of the energy sphere (the amount of force that pushes the earth outwards), you get the exact same force that outer space is pushing back against the earth, which is the Centripetal Force of the earth = 3.7651509559105 x 10^22.



Gravock

[Gravock]

Where am I going with all of this? The Doc has said distance is important. Take this distance of a particular spatial resonance frequency, multiply it by 2 to represent the diameter of an orbit. You can then use the diameter of this orbit, the circumference of this orbit, etc. and apply this to the equations used to find the speed of light on earth and mars. Then take the diameter, circumference, etc. of a different spatial resonance frequency and do the same thing. You may need to use reverse math to find any missing parameters. I strongly suspect you'll find a golden ratio somewhere by using those equations or other equations which is drawn from them. This concept can also be applied elsewhere, other than the spatial resonance frequencies. You can also try to map out the Centripetal Force as it was applied to earth in my previous post, and/or use the equations for the density. If and where you find a golden ratio, and I strongly suspect you will find one, then it'll answer one question after another. I think Doc's work is related to the expansion acceleration of space and matter. Expansion acceleration of matter moving past light is what gives matter it's mass. Trust me on this. The idea of expansion acceleration of space from mainstream science isn't anymore plausible or less laughable than the idea of matter also undergoing expansion acceleration after we realize matter is only deformed space. I'm interested in hearing any thoughts on this.

Gravocks

[Inquorate]

It would be quite a coincidence if it didn't turn out to have a basis in truth.

[Tecstatic]

@Gravock,

Thank you for your posts :-)

At the moment I'm on a steep learning curve in other stuff, so please excuse me for this short post (better short than no post).

One other thing about the properties of the GM:

Let a = 1, b = GM, c = GM^2, then c = a+b.

Please allow me to continue my questions to consider:

Does the GM also apply to living organisms ?

What can be said about the relation between Fibonacci numbers and and the GM ?

Does the GM relate to the dimensions of L3 ?

Does the descibed Earth/Mars relationship relate to coils and our intended use of coils ?

Eric

[Gravock]

Not only is there a Golden Ratio with the speed of light between earth and mars, there is also a Golden Ratio with the density of earth and the density of mars. Earth Density^2 / Mars Density^2 = Golden Ratio. There's more! There's a Golden Ratio between earth's orbit velocity^2 / mar's orbit velocity^2 = Golden Ratio.

I wonder what the Spatial Resonance Frequency of earth and mars would be? I think the SRF of earth is 1,094,000 and the SRF of mars is 676,143 (or maybe also 1,094,000). It should be one or the other. Earth SRF / Mars SRF = Golden Ratio. 299,792,458 / 274 = 1,094,000 and 185,350,924 / 274 = 676,143. (274) is the gravitational acceleration at the surface of the sun as calculated on earth. Or, is the SRF of earth and mar's both 1,094,000 and the gravtational acceleration of the sun is calculated on Mar's as 169, which would then be a Golden Ratio between 274 and 169? I think the SRF is related to the expansion acceleration of an object. The earth's expansion acceleration rate of 9.801 / mar's expansion acceleration rate of 3.123 = 3.14 or Pi. Is there a harmonic which is both related to earth and mars' SRF? Just a thought. I wonder if 13.74 mHz SRF is a harmonic of earth and another planetary body in the solar system, such as mar's (or maybe the sun?). Wouldn't the harmonic or multiples thereof also be related to all the planetary bodies and/or all objects located within the solar system which is related to the same multiple? I think it's a possibility.

Gravock

[Tecstatic]

@Gravock

Thank you for posting your findings, according to a friend, all the universe obey the GM rule.

If any of you despite the extreme silence here would like to be constructive, it is essential to be able to measure the srf of a coil.

Doc's state of the art SA is so sensitive, that it can see the coil resonate due to be exited by the background noise. This signal is very weak.

But there is another way to do a precise measurement.

Doc has shown how to measure srf in a video. A coax wire with a connector at one end and the screen removed at the other end, so the inner wire including its isolation is exposed so it can be used for the measurement.

Make one extra similar coax wire and connect it to your SG. and the other coax wire to the your SA.
Let the two exposed ends point towards a common point at 90 degree angle between them. Have a distance of approx 5cm between the ends.

Adjust your SG to output 15MHz and raise the level of the SG so the SA shows the 15MHz frequency peak barely above the noise floor of the SA.

Now you add your L3 coil to measure to the SA coax wire like Doc has shown.

Then sweep the SG frequency slowly, when you hit the coil srf, the previously barely visible frequency peak from the SG will be amplified 10-20 db by the coil. Where the peak is maximum, you have the srf frequency. When you have found the srf frequency, note that the srf rises slightly if the SG wire is move a bit further away from the coil.

---------

I can understand that you guys previously posting here probably feels this is too difficult, over their head or whatever the way of expressing it.

On the other hand, if you don't try, your understanding stays put at current level.

IMHO it is amazing nobody has taken a ruler or caliper or simply taken the dimensions of L3 from Doc's documentation to get an increased insight regarding the GM, and posting their insights here. All your time invested is lost if you stop. Better to do something than nothing.

Eric

[NickZ]

Glad to see someone activating this very important thread. It's more than a shame to see it go dormant.
I for one don't have the proper equipment, nor will I obtain it, so I have gone the way of the regular Exciter that Slayer and others have come up with. Although those were very interesting projects, I see their possibly less than 50% or so efficiency levels. And not the real deal, as the Doc has mentioned, though they are still very useful for learning and hands on experimenting. Most of the other Exciter threads have also gone dormant as well now. Very sad to see...
If there is any way to obtain proper tuned coils that are matched to the proper SEC frequencies, that would be one way of going further without having all the proper gear. Or I'll just wait until some device is available at a reasonable price in kit form, or built already built up. Probably only a matter of time. I hope...
In any case, I'm very glad to see some more interest in this field, even if I can't personally contribute much to it, I'm still more than interested in following along until I'm able to do something about it.

Eric: Maybe you can show just how you have done what you are mentioning in your post, such as in a video. I have seen the Doc's video of that, but, do you have a different version of that, or not?
NickZ

[Inquorate]

waiting for a payout to buy better equipment.. haven't dropped the ball, merely put it down for a while..

[Tecstatic]

Nice to see some responses.

Am I right nobody is in possesion of a ruler or caliper to measure L3 dimensions, alternatively using the L3 dimensions from Doc and a calculator to to determine length / diameter ratio to do some new insights ?

Theory and expensive equipment is nice to have, but some things require just desire for new insights and learning by doing.

Eric

[NickZ]

I had the same idea a while back, but was told by the Doc that without the All the proper gear it was impossible.
But, I dare to fumble in the dark, until I get a response, even if it's not perfect, or close to it. I'd rather trip over my own feet than not try walking. So, that I can learn to run.
Please show us the way especially if different from what has been shown.
The PSEC was never actually developed to the point of lighting more than a couple of Leds, or am I wrong? I hope so...
Dr. Stiffler mentioned that he would not let his ideas go unexpressed, and dormant, again.
Can we carry the stick a little further?

NickZ

[Tecstatic]

Please forget for a while everything about SG and SA and oscilloskopes or other dreams you maybe can not afford.

Have your calculator ready for use and take a look at Dr.Stifflers video "3-Coil srf Demo Part#3" and listen carefully to what Doc says.
Watch the pictures below, and read my latest posts after the long pause.

Please do some thinking and share your thoughts here.

I know I'm not in a position to demand anything from you, likewise don't expect me to post here to a non-responsive forum for much longer.

Eric

[Inquorate]

One of the problems with this thread might be the insistence of participationg members on other member's input. Just saying this out loud: i don't expect a response, but if i had not continued to post and post and post, practically to myself, we wouldn't even be here.

I don't even understand the golden ratio, let alone how it relates to the L3.

I happen to be on a new tablet and can't sleep, or i wouldnt be here at 2:30 am, let alone have the time in all reasonableness to check ratios of my or Doctor Stiffler's L3's at the moment. If i attempt to watch the video, my wife or my 11 month old will wake (my 2.5 year old has made off with my headphones ao i cannot listen to audio)....

And i probably speak for others who have similar excuses, or whatever.

I'd love to know what you are onto Tec. If you feel ready to share, please do. otherwise, please know that when time, money? and circumstance permits, i will continue to investigate these phenomena and if you are still interested then, i will join you again.

[Tecstatic]

Ben, I know life is not that easy for you, and your efforts are appreciated, you know that.

But what about the rest, who has followed this thread ?

Let me say this: What is the relation between the two frequencies Doc mentiones in the video mentioned in my previous post. Has this also something to do with the best length / diameter ratio of a coil.

Is this relation and powers thereof fundamental for successful exitation obtaining gain ?

Erik

[SeaMonkey]

Many of the early Radio Frequency researchers,
perhaps most notably Tesla, discovered the
length/diameter ratio of coils and how it affected
efficiency. For every coil at some specific
frequency there are dimensions which balance the
intrinsic L and C characteristics to achieve
maximum Q (Magnification Factor) for end fed
resonance.

Dr. Stiffler's work is in many ways similar to what
Tesla was seeking. Tesla worked with very high
voltages out of necessity and Dr. Stiffler has found
that the phenomena can also be researched at
very low power levels with modern
instrumentation and semiconductor devices.

Working with Radio Frequencies and resonant
circuits on a table top is always difficult and tricky.
Standing wave patterns are extremely sensitive
to coil dimensions, connecting lead (wire) lengths,
distributed capacitance, body (hand capacitance)
effects, ground planes and a host of other things.
Getting a setup "tweaked" for maximum effect
can be a painstaking and frustrating process
which guarantees that only those with great
patience will ever see any progress.

Those difficulties will screen out the vast majority
of those who show interest in replicating the
setups. The number of those who carry on to
eventually see some success will be quite small.

Nearly all will give up at some point along the way
because of the great amount of effort and patience
required to conduct the research and to see any
evidence of success. That some few are still
working on this is remarkable.

[Tecstatic]

Obtaining what we all want is not that easy.

But trust me, the more you understand, the easier it gets.

Eric

[NickZ]

There are also some of us that can't or won't do what has been or is still recommended to achieve results with this circuit. Like me. For those of us, buying a ready made device is the answer, to at least begin to experiment. But, even those that purchased one or more of the Docs boards have gone dormant. Why?
Aren't these SEC and PSEC units not one of the most amazing devices invented, up to now? That may open the door to even better results in the future?

I see that there are some new Dr. Stiffler videos that have been uploaded recently. But, they may not be dealing with PSEC devices, but electrolysis instead.

I had asked for some more information dealing with the tuning method on these devices, if other than what the Doc has posted previously, but, using no SG or SA.
I am not expecting a "free lunch", and will do my part, if I am able.
NickZ

[Tecstatic]

Hi NickZ,

Im confident you are able to write down the two frequencies in Docs video I mentioned in post #771, he mentiones 2 sets of frequencies one before well tuned and one set after tuning.

Then divide the the higher frequency with the lower frequency for each set and post the sets and ratios here. Its an eye opener and the key to do progress with our work.

Eric

[NickZ]

Eric:
Are you talking about the two peaks on the SA reading 13.6 and the 14.6 MHz, and also the 23.5 MHz, at the 4 minute point of the video, below?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAfn2QFYkLU

Nick_Z

[Tecstatic]

@NickZ

You got the right video.

Please pay attention at 3:01, 3:20, 4:00 and 4:05. Also observe the untuned and tuned spectrums shown after 3:00.

Please let me hear what you find using your calculator.

Eric

[NickZ]

When you say "tuned" are you meaning the slight movement of the two coils affecting the frequency? I have re-watched the parts of the video that you are mentioning.
Please post the math divisions that you are suggesting, as I'm not sure what you mean. Is this it... 14.6 MHz divided by the 13.6 MHz = 1.07 Or not?